Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 4th Aug 2011 21:38 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y The Google-Microsoft patent war of words is continuing. Yesterday, Google (rightfully so, in my book) accused Apple, Microsoft, and Oracle partaking in an organised patent attack against Android, instead of competing on merit, claiming that they bought up Novell's and Nortel's patents solely to attack Android and its device makers. Microsoft struck back, claiming Google was offered to join in on the bids for the Novell patents, but rejected the offer. Google has now responded to this accusation - and to make matters even more confusing, Microsoft responded back. A public shouting match between two powerful parties? Count me in!
Thread beginning with comment 483994
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
kovacm
Member since:
2010-12-16

ell, when Sun was still on its own, its CEO, Jonathan Schwarz, publicly and explicitly endorsed Android's use of Java in a blog post - a post that has since been removed by Oracle. But, as we all know, the internet never forgets.


and than we have:

http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2348832&cid=36882124

---


Relevant dates and links:

November 5, 2007 - Google announces Android [blogspot.com], doesn't mention Java
November 5, 2007 - Later that day, Schwartz posts blog praising Android as "Java/Linux platform"
November 12, 2007 - First release of Android source, Dalvik revealed. This blog [http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/110/], written that day, has a pretty good explanation of the fast one Google pulled on Sun. "How did Google manage to get Sun to license off a platform that could very well kill their own? Turns out, they didn’t: their move was even smarter than Sun’s."

Edited 2011-08-07 08:35 UTC

Reply Score: 1