Linked by snydeq on Mon 8th Aug 2011 22:14 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 484231
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Meanwhile in a parallel universeÃ��Ã&Aci
by MOS6510 on Tue 9th Aug 2011 16:41
in reply to "RE[7]: Meanwhile in a parallel universeÃ��Ã&Aci"
RE[8]: Meanwhile in a parallel universeÃ��Ã&Aci
by Tony Swash on Tue 9th Aug 2011 17:56
in reply to "RE[7]: Meanwhile in a parallel universeÃ��Ã&Aci"
Look at the consortia buying the Novell and Nortel patents. Look at the curious simultaneous lawsuits. Look at the fact that these companies make up the old boys network using legal means to keep out newcomers. Look at the close friendship between Ellison and Jobs. Denying there's a concerted effort going on to attack Android at this point in time is laughable.
Speculative waffle. When you start talking about 'curious simultaneous lawsuits' but don't show the slightest shred of evidence to show collusion you reveal yourself wandering into fantasy land - Area 51 territory. Maybe the 'curious simultaneous lawsuits' is the result of simultaneous breaches of other people's patents based on a mad scramble by the handset makers to catch up to the iPhone after being caught completely flat footed.
And then to cap it all you mention the Nortel consortium as evidence of this shadowy cartel - a consortium into which Google were invited and which included Apple, RIM and Microsoft all whom are competing against each other. Google declined to join.
The only plot is the one Google lost when it so totally cocked that one up. And then whined about it. And then people you like you who should know better become trapped in some sort of Google PR imaginary land.
Sheesh.
RE[9]: Meanwhile in a parallel universeÃ��Ã&Aci
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 9th Aug 2011 18:09
in reply to "RE[8]: Meanwhile in a parallel universeÃ��Ã&Aci"




Member since:
2005-06-29
Oh come one, don't make it seem as if using force defensively is the same as using it offensively. That's utterly idiotic, and you know it. I have no issues with a company using patents defensively, much in the same way I don't have any issues with, say, shop owners in London using violence to protect their shops from being looted.
Look at the consortia buying the Novell and Nortel patents. Look at the curious simultaneous lawsuits. Look at the fact that these companies make up the old boys network using legal means to keep out newcomers. Look at the close friendship between Ellison and Jobs. Denying there's a concerted effort going on to attack Android at this point in time is laughable.