Linked by snydeq on Fri 12th Aug 2011 19:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 484925
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Refuting a factually incorrect statement is useful to most but doing it with lies has the opposite effect.
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence"*
You however felt strong enough to call the statements by soulrebel123 lies**.
* Is the reason why I didn't use world lying in my original statement, in favour of "factually incorrect".
** Lie - an intentionally false statement.
BTW: The "99.9% of people" is a hyperbole that is wildly off target. 0.01% = ~6milion people or ~ 2milion actual computer users. India produces 3 milion IT graduates each year.
Edited 2011-08-14 19:56 UTC




Member since:
2007-05-27
The only part of the piece that I replied to, that was accurate, was that Linux is free. And using the cost as something that Linux "can do" and Windows "can't" is well .. lets just say, creatively pushing the limits of logic
See another post for more info: http://www.osnews.com/thread?484833
Refuting a factually incorrect statement is useful to most but doing it with lies has the opposite effect.