Linked by snydeq on Fri 12th Aug 2011 03:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 484927
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Mainframe have never been marketed for CPU-intensive tasks. They're highly reliable machines designed to handle large-I/O applications, which is why you seem them used for airline reservation systems and other similar things which require low latency and a large number of concurrent users.
So we agree then that Mainframe cpus have weak cpus? That Intels latest high end server cpus are much faster?
Of course I also agree on the rest of what you say. I have never denied that Mainframes have superior I/O. You can not find any posts from me, saying something else. Because I know Mainframes have good I/O. I have never disputed that. 296.000 I/O channels and lot of I/O cpus help a lot.




Member since:
2005-07-12
Mainframe have never been marketed for CPU-intensive tasks. They're highly reliable machines designed to handle large-I/O applications, which is why you seem them used for airline reservation systems and other similar things which require low latency and a large number of concurrent users.