Linked by David Adams on Sun 14th Aug 2011 22:41 UTC, submitted by subterrific
Thread beginning with comment 485007
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-08
I wonder why people haven't looked more into C and Objective C.
No one truly masters C++. But each one likes his own subset of it
There are still lots of people using C, huge projects even. Things like GLib, embedded software (the faction that have stopped using Asm directly, I mean) or the kernel of most Unices come to mind.
As for Objective C, well... Once again, Apple have been too much of control freaks and have pissed of the geek audience because of that, the problem being that in that case, it was their target audience. Besides, there's not much of a benefit in using Objective C over C++, and you lose a lot of language flexibility by doing so (C++ can be used at a lower level, be lighter on resource, it offers metaprogramming and operator overloading...).
To sum it up, the reason why Objective C has never taken off outside of the Apple world is that C++ is what its users want it to be, whereas Objective C is what Apple want it to be.
Edited 2011-08-15 06:44 UTC