Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 15th Aug 2011 12:58 UTC
Legal Dutch news website WebWereld.nl investigated the claim that Apple supplied the German court with tampered evidence, and their research is pretty self-explanatory. I don't have the time to translate the article for you, but the images speak about ten thousands words; Apple has changed the aspect ratio of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in a side-by-side comparison (while also showing Android's application drawer open instead of showing the home screen, but the article doesn't mention that). Come on, Apple. Update: As Gusar notes, Apple also Photoshopped the Samsung logo off the bezel. Real classy, Apple.
Thread beginning with comment 485145
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: quick to judge ...
by MOS6510 on Mon 15th Aug 2011 17:49 UTC in reply to "quick to judge ..."
MOS6510
Member since:
2011-05-12

Samsung lawyers claimed on day one the pictures were editted, but for reasons unknown didn't follow it up with any evidence or even a mention on day two.

Thom, the Apple hater/device owner, reported what happened on day one, but not day two.

Webwereld isn't the most accurate tech news site either.

But hey, Thoms promotes any anti-Apple news to absolute truth and any pro-Apple news as lies, so this has to be true too.

Reply Parent Score: -6

RE[2]: quick to judge ...
by Neolander on Mon 15th Aug 2011 21:10 in reply to "RE: quick to judge ..."
Neolander Member since:
2010-03-08

Thom, the Apple hater/device owner, reported what happened on day one, but not day two.

http://www.osnews.com/comments/25057

So much for factual accuracy on your side...

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: quick to judge ...
by MOS6510 on Tue 16th Aug 2011 03:22 in reply to "RE[2]: quick to judge ..."
MOS6510 Member since:
2011-05-12

I don't see him mentioning Samsung's lawyers "forgot" about their day one claim. They clearly dropped it for some reason, probabbly because it wasn't going to hold, yet Thom keeps acting like it's already a proven fact.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: quick to judge ...
by testman on Mon 15th Aug 2011 23:03 in reply to "RE: quick to judge ..."
testman Member since:
2007-10-15

But hey, Thoms promotes any anti-Apple news to absolute truth and any pro-Apple news as lies, so this has to be true too.

One may argue that it is more cynicism towards the industry as a whole than Apple themself.

Edited 2011-08-15 23:03 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: quick to judge ...
by BallmerKnowsBest on Tue 16th Aug 2011 14:55 in reply to "RE: quick to judge ..."
BallmerKnowsBest Member since:
2008-06-02

Thom, the Apple hater


"hater"? That sounds like something you'd read in the youtube comments of a tween girl defending Justin Beiber.

But hey, it's good to see that iFanboys have finally abandoned the pretension that Apple's products are for the refined, intelligent, and cultured elite.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: quick to judge ...
by MOS6510 on Tue 16th Aug 2011 15:47 in reply to "RE[2]: quick to judge ..."
MOS6510 Member since:
2011-05-12

"hater"? That sounds like something you'd read in the youtube comments of a tween girl defending Justin Beiber.

I don't watch those videos, but I believe you.

But hey, it's good to see that iFanboys have finally abandoned the pretension that Apple's products are for the refined, intelligent, and cultured elite.

In time all your self made misconceptions will be resolved.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: quick to judge ...
by vitae on Tue 16th Aug 2011 17:31 in reply to "RE[2]: quick to judge ..."
vitae Member since:
2006-02-20

You should take pity on them. They think that Apple loves them rather than just wanting to soak them out of as much cash as possible.

Reply Parent Score: 2