To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I said all of MMI's relevant patents. I should perhaps have been clearer and said instead "all of MIM's patents relevant to the pool".
In the case of the OIN pool, the pool is for Linux-related patents.
In the case of the WebM pool, the pool is for video codec patents.
A significant number of the MMI patents will be rleated to one or the other of these pools. All such patents will automatically be licensed to all of the members of the relevant pool.
For example, according to Oracle, the Java-related patents at issue are not specific to Linux, and therefore are not relevant to the OIN community pool. Since Java is cross-platform, Oracle are probably right here.
In that case I agree with you, but... My only caveat is you contention that a "significant" number of MMI patents would be relevant to Linux and WebM. I suspect there might be a few, but I doubt it would even be in the double digits. Most of MMI's patents are going to be on hardware inventions and communications processes... Just saying.
Now if Google were to create a community pool based on the MMI patents (like it did with On2's), that would probably go a long way to appease the naysayers. It would also make the Samsungs and HTCs of the world a lot more comfortably with the arrangement (I know they are publicly supportive, but it must make them at least a little nervous). I personally expect them to do exactly this once the dust settles.
Having said that, apparently if they do buy MMI one of the things Google will be buying is a JavaME license.





Member since:
2006-01-14
While I believe you are right on the surface, both Oracle and Google are OIN members. Yet Oracle is suing Google over an open source project. Not really sure how its suppose to work.