Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 15th Aug 2011 12:58 UTC
Legal Dutch news website investigated the claim that Apple supplied the German court with tampered evidence, and their research is pretty self-explanatory. I don't have the time to translate the article for you, but the images speak about ten thousands words; Apple has changed the aspect ratio of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in a side-by-side comparison (while also showing Android's application drawer open instead of showing the home screen, but the article doesn't mention that). Come on, Apple. Update: As Gusar notes, Apple also Photoshopped the Samsung logo off the bezel. Real classy, Apple.
Thread beginning with comment 485218
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Fanboyism.
by Finalzone on Tue 16th Aug 2011 00:54 UTC in reply to "Fanboyism."
Member since:

But for once, it would be nice if people argued the merits of a subject instead of calling each other names, reacting in ways they've done so many times it's second nature now. This forum seems to be turning into the US Government.

This article is about showing the dark side of Apple attempting to destroy competitions with litigation. Outside OSNews and other informative websites, many people are not aware about negative impacts of patents used as weapon to stifle innovations and evolution in IT world.

It is very important to keep readers informed about the sad reality related to anti-competitive behaviour of most larger companies (in this case Apple), not to sideline crucial part that are patent laws affecting technologies, developers ,and consumers.

Edited 2011-08-16 00:55 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: Fanboyism.
by plan9 on Tue 16th Aug 2011 01:26 in reply to "RE: Fanboyism."
plan9 Member since:

But I think you are missing my point; I have no issue with the article , only the immediate prediction by some of Apple "fanboys" immediately rejecting the news itself. I think it would be nice to just not hear "fanboy" for a while, and instead argue the MERITS of an article, instead of calling people names ( and I'm talking about both sides, not just one or the other). How easy is it to denigrate someones opinion because you've pre-classified them before they can say something? That smacks of intellectual laziness to me.

Reply Parent Score: 2