Linked by David Adams on Wed 17th Aug 2011 05:55 UTC, submitted by cromat
Thread beginning with comment 485475
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Good for a tech demo, but nothng really useful.
by AndrewZ on Wed 17th Aug 2011 12:01
in reply to "RE: Good for a tech demo, but nothng really useful."
In theory, and let me emphasize theory, you could do a Chrome OS type of thing ... take a barebones OS, add a web rendering engine, a Silverlight or a Flash runtime and add your "Web OS" on top.
In theory, if you put a saddle on a dog, it's now a horse. But in reality it's not. Silverlight has no: protected memory, virtual memory, filesystem support, multi-tasking. So it's not really close to being an OS.
Bad article title.
RE[3]: Good for a tech demo, but nothng really useful.
by BluenoseJake on Wed 17th Aug 2011 15:02
in reply to "RE[2]: Good for a tech demo, but nothng really useful."
RE[3]: Good for a tech demo, but nothng really useful.
by pandronic on Wed 17th Aug 2011 20:31
in reply to "RE[2]: Good for a tech demo, but nothng really useful."
In theory, if you put a saddle on a dog, it's now a horse. But in reality it's not. Silverlight has no: protected memory, virtual memory, filesystem support, multi-tasking. So it's not really close to being an OS.
Bad article title.
Bad article title.
I'm not so sure this things are important to the vast majority of people. What I think is important is the experience to the end user. The rest is easily provided by Linux, BSD or why not a stripped down Windows.





Member since:
2006-05-18
In theory, and let me emphasize theory, you could do a Chrome OS type of thing ... take a barebones OS, add a web rendering engine, a Silverlight or a Flash runtime and add your "Web OS" on top.
Granted the web part is more of a shell or a desktop environment than an OS.