Linked by David Adams on Tue 16th Aug 2011 16:47 UTC
Linux When it comes to the fast-moving business of trading stocks, bonds and derivatives, the world's financial exchanges are finding an ally in Linux. As late as 2007, Wall Street exchanges were still largely run on Unix . . . Over the past few years however, Linux has crept into this market, showing up first in ancillary systems and then running a few core exchanges.
Thread beginning with comment 485489
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: solaris is meehh
by Kebabbert on Wed 17th Aug 2011 10:26 UTC in reply to "RE: solaris is meehh"
Kebabbert
Member since:
2007-07-27

My real experiences of Solaris was 10 years ago and people called it Slowlaris so I don't really know.

I think that was the same time that Solaris wasn't very compatible with many open source software because it used a lot of the BSD-/non-GNU-tooling.

So it wasn't very attractive, at least not to me.

The reason it was called Slowlaris was because of its slow TCP/IP stack. It has now been rewritten and is called FireEngine. In older benchmarks I found, Solaris gives 30% more TCP/IP performance than Linux - on same hardware.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: solaris is meehh
by bannor99 on Wed 17th Aug 2011 16:00 in reply to "RE[2]: solaris is meehh"
bannor99 Member since:
2005-09-15

"My real experiences of Solaris was 10 years ago and people called it Slowlaris so I don't really know.

I think that was the same time that Solaris wasn't very compatible with many open source software because it used a lot of the BSD-/non-GNU-tooling.

So it wasn't very attractive, at least not to me.

The reason it was called Slowlaris was because of its slow TCP/IP stack. It has now been rewritten and is called FireEngine. In older benchmarks I found, Solaris gives 30% more TCP/IP performance than Linux - on same hardware.
"
Slowlaris was the name given to Solaris x86 in the '90s and it was very slow - if you could get it to install. As for Fire Engine, it was 1/3 faster compared to RHEL 3.0 - that was SEVEN years ago.
Since neither OS has stood still, more recent comparisons of performance and scalability are needed.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: solaris is meehh
by Kebabbert on Thu 18th Aug 2011 10:33 in reply to "RE[3]: solaris is meehh"
Kebabbert Member since:
2007-07-27

The reason it was called Slowlaris was because of its slow TCP/IP stack. It has now been rewritten and is called FireEngine. In older benchmarks I found, Solaris gives 30% more TCP/IP performance than Linux - on same hardware.

Slowlaris was the name given to Solaris x86 in the '90s and it was very slow - if you could get it to install. As for Fire Engine, it was 1/3 faster compared to RHEL 3.0 - that was SEVEN years ago.
Since neither OS has stood still, more recent comparisons of performance and scalability are needed. [/q]
Yes, more recent comparisons are needed. The funny thing is that when I show recent comparisons between Solaris and Linux (Solaris always wins) then I always hear the same argument that say something like

"Come on, your comparison is half a year old! Half a year! Now Linux is on v2.6.43 and not v2.6.39!!! That is not an accurate comparison! More recent comparisons are needed!"

Whereas I have seen comparisons like, Solaris 800 MHz vs a Linux brand new Intel Duo Core at 2.4GHz. And the motiviation is "they have the same price tag, therefore Linux is faster". No, wrong. You should compare the OS on the same hardware. Only then you can draw a conclusion. (And if you compare on the same hardware, Linux looses. Do you want to see links?)

Reply Parent Score: 2