Linked by snydeq on Tue 16th Aug 2011 16:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 485534
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-18
1. It isn't hard to get your CSS specificity correct.
2. The whole point of semantic elements with CSS 3.0 is that I don't end up with div-itius and I actually have mark-up that represents what the f--k I want it to be.
3. If you want XHTML you can still have it, all one has to do is stick the XML namespace onto the <html> tag.
4. This BLOAT rubbish really pisses me off ... Computer tech has moved on since the 90s and the bandwidth I have available on my mobile phone is 20x - 30x what we had. Processor speed is soo fast now I can't even max out my fairly modest rig. JS now get compiled, so I don't even have to worry about optimizing loops (where JS was notoriously bad).
You stay in the 90s ... and resist change but the rest of the web community will leave you guys behind.
5. There will be no HTML6 spec ... HTML is now a rolling standard.
Edited 2011-08-17 15:22 UTC