Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 18th Aug 2011 19:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 485878
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You are right, they don't need another "useless" one, but a good one or great one (like iOS) would be OK. The more the merrier I say. I remember the days when most PC's you bought had different OS's on them, C64, Apple 2, Trash-80's, Amiga, BBC etc... As long as we can share data, who cares...
The more the merrier I say. I remember the days when most PC's you bought had different OS's on them, C64, Apple 2, Trash-80's, Amiga, BBC etc... As long as we can share data, who cares...
I don't recall being able to share data among any of those systems. Even the ones that were based on the same processor had entirely different environments, file structures, etc. It was fun trying to re-implement programs from school at home though.
For reference, my first computer (and initiation to BASIC programming via TI-BASIC) was on a TI-99/4a at five years old; I asked for a computer in lieu of a bicycle and other toys that Christmas and that's what I got. In the following years I also used Apples and Macs at school and a Commodore VIC-20, Atari 400 (god I still hate that keyboard) and TRS-80 CoCo 2 at home.
The only retro machines I have left are another VIC-20 (thanks to my girlfriend; she never got rid of hers) and a Mac Performa 460 from the early 90s that is fully functional. It's the last Mac I'll ever own, sadly.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Why? If the OS cannot compete, then it should be dropped. As simple as that. We already have Android, Apple's crap, Windows Phone, Meego etc. Why the hell do people need YET ANOTHER useless OS?