Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 18th Aug 2011 19:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 485937
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Hurd was NOT a great CEO! It only appears that way, but once you dig up the facts and talk to the people involved with HP, you'll quickly realize he's made major mistakes. I admit, not as horrible as Fiorina, but still, his decisions were not so favorable for the company. His relentless cost-cutting measures, for the most part, really did the most damage, especially to the R&D division. If a company won't spend on R&D, it might as well be dead, as it's only prolonging an inevitable failure.
I'm not saying I necessarily agree with Apotheker's decisions, but so far he seems to give good reasoning behind his actions and it appears the board members also agree with the direction he's taking with the company.