Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Aug 2011 21:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 486300
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Bummed to see this now
by fretinator on Mon 22nd Aug 2011 21:30
in reply to "Bummed to see this now"
RE[2]: Bummed to see this now
by spiderman on Tue 23rd Aug 2011 06:18
in reply to "RE: Bummed to see this now"
RE: Bummed to see this now
by Thom_Holwerda on Mon 22nd Aug 2011 21:47
in reply to "Bummed to see this now"
This news would've been great had you guys posted it a couple of days ago when they dropped the price, instead of today, when they're already sold out everywhere.
Yeah I know but I've pretty much just emerged from a masters thesis-induced coma. Back in the real world now. Done with university. FOREVAR.
RE[2]: Bummed to see this now
by clasqm on Mon 22nd Aug 2011 22:48
in reply to "RE: Bummed to see this now"
RE[2]: Bummed to see this now
by vitae on Mon 22nd Aug 2011 23:25
in reply to "RE: Bummed to see this now"
RE[2]: Bummed to see this now
by WorknMan on Tue 23rd Aug 2011 01:13
in reply to "RE: Bummed to see this now"
Yeah I know but I've pretty much just emerged from a masters thesis-induced coma. Back in the real world now. Done with university. FOREVAR.
Hey that's alright, Thom. Now that you're out of school, I bet we can look forward to an assload of more patent-related articles
PS: Why can't you guys use the f**king 'quote' tag like every other bulletin board system instead of 'q', or at least make both work.
Edited 2011-08-23 01:24 UTC
RE[2]: Bummed to see this now
by kristianhk on Tue 23rd Aug 2011 09:20
in reply to "RE: Bummed to see this now"
If phones running these kinds of specs cost $500-$600, I'm not sure why you think somebody can make a tablet (with an even bigger screen) and sell it for $200 less, and have it not suck.
In other words, a matter of a year or so, tops. And who knows what Amazon might unveil soon... (especially since they won't be afraid to make up the cost on media they will sell)
Check out, say, ZTE Blade; what can be had, since the beginning of this year, in a phone factor for half of the price you quote. And while tablet factor makes for more materials, more expensive screen and battery ...some thing are probably easier, cheaper (no need for such extreme miniaturisation)
But overall, it would be still to much duplication for my taste; too close to smartphones. So I wouldn't be surprised at all if we'll eventually settle on "small tablets" or "large smartphones" (without their presently silly premiums), just one device (which would also finally give real purpose to Bluetooth headsets
)
RE: Bummed to see this now
by bnolsen on Tue 23rd Aug 2011 00:26
in reply to "Bummed to see this now"
The cheap chinese knockoffs right now have super crap resolutions (800x480) and resistive screens. Cheap soc's however are getting better, the newer ones put the performance in the ipad1 range.
The 16GB version of the Touchpad is estimated $296 in quality materials. Totally different class of machine.
I think right now the LCD and touch screen dominate the costs, which of course is where the chinese tablets fail in providing the price.
RE: Bummed to see this now
by unclefester on Tue 23rd Aug 2011 05:55
in reply to "Bummed to see this now"
If phones running these kinds of specs cost $500-$600, I'm not sure why you think somebody can make a tablet (with an even bigger screen) and sell it for $200 less, and have it not suck. Possibly the only company that could do it is Apple, since nobody else makes money off of app sales, but Apple sure as hell won't do it, so long as people are always lined up to purchase an iPad.
You obviously know nothing about economics.
Most products retail for at least 10-20 times the manufacturing cost.
Those $500 phones almost certainly have a unit manufacturing cost of <<$50 each.
RE[2]: Bummed to see this now
by kristoph on Tue 23rd Aug 2011 06:01
in reply to "RE: Bummed to see this now"
You obviously know nothing about economics.
Most products retail for at least 10-20 times the manufacturing cost.
Those $500 phones almost certainly have a unit manufacturing cost of
Most products retail for at least 10-20 times the manufacturing cost.
Those $500 phones almost certainly have a unit manufacturing cost of
You do understand that the reason why HP is getting out of the TouchPad and the desktop PC business (which they currently dominate) is because the margins are like minuscule (5% at best).
Sure, premium clothing and accessories might sell for 10-20 their manufacturing cost but consumer electronics never had these type of margins.
RE: Bummed to see this now
by Yoko_T on Tue 23rd Aug 2011 22:42
in reply to "Bummed to see this now"
This news would've been great had you guys posted it a couple of days ago when they dropped the price, instead of today, when they're already sold out everywhere.
As for laptop vs tablet, I already have a desktop, so I'd much rather have a tablet more than a laptop for the few times I do travel. As for high demand for cheap tablets, how come nobody picked up those cheap $100-$200 iPad knockoffs that came out before Honeycomb was released? Oh yeah, that's right... because they were all pieces of shit, with the possible exception of the Nook Color, which wasn't exactly a tablet to begin with.
If phones running these kinds of specs cost $500-$600, I'm not sure why you think somebody can make a tablet (with an even bigger screen) and sell it for $200 less, and have it not suck. Possibly the only company that could do it is Apple, since nobody else makes money off of app sales, but Apple sure as hell won't do it, so long as people are always lined up to purchase an iPad.
As for laptop vs tablet, I already have a desktop, so I'd much rather have a tablet more than a laptop for the few times I do travel. As for high demand for cheap tablets, how come nobody picked up those cheap $100-$200 iPad knockoffs that came out before Honeycomb was released? Oh yeah, that's right... because they were all pieces of shit, with the possible exception of the Nook Color, which wasn't exactly a tablet to begin with.
If phones running these kinds of specs cost $500-$600, I'm not sure why you think somebody can make a tablet (with an even bigger screen) and sell it for $200 less, and have it not suck. Possibly the only company that could do it is Apple, since nobody else makes money off of app sales, but Apple sure as hell won't do it, so long as people are always lined up to purchase an iPad.
You're wrong because nobody in their right mind is going to buy something off the internet from an outfit they've never heard of before, especially it's hyped by people they know absolutely nothing about.
Can you say Ebay Scam? Most Likely.






Member since:
2005-11-13
This news would've been great had you guys posted it a couple of days ago when they dropped the price, instead of today, when they're already sold out everywhere.
As for laptop vs tablet, I already have a desktop, so I'd much rather have a tablet more than a laptop for the few times I do travel. As for high demand for cheap tablets, how come nobody picked up those cheap $100-$200 iPad knockoffs that came out before Honeycomb was released? Oh yeah, that's right... because they were all pieces of shit, with the possible exception of the Nook Color, which wasn't exactly a tablet to begin with.
If phones running these kinds of specs cost $500-$600, I'm not sure why you think somebody can make a tablet (with an even bigger screen) and sell it for $200 less, and have it not suck. Possibly the only company that could do it is Apple, since nobody else makes money off of app sales, but Apple sure as hell won't do it, so long as people are always lined up to purchase an iPad.
Edited 2011-08-22 21:37 UTC