Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Aug 2011 21:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 486486
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-06-02
Funny, because I could have sworn that there was another
overly-sanitized, gated community-esque platform which had almost that exact number of users at its peak... before the more open, less-restrictive alternatives caught up and completely annihilated them. Damn it, what were they called again? The name is right on the tip ofmy tongue...
Oh yeah, that was "America Online". By Apple fanboy logic, AOL "beat" the internet because they had a greater number of users than any other single ISP. Remind me, how did that work out for them in the long run?
Just an iPad market.
Yeah, keep telling yourself that. Look at the history of general-purpose computing and you'll see that walled-garden single-vendor systems ALWAYS lose to open, multi-vendor systems. It's only a matter of time before Android does to iOS what the "real" internet did to AOL 10-15 years ago.
Posted from my Xoom.
Hahaha,
BallmerKnowsBest