Linked by David Adams on Mon 22nd Aug 2011 22:54 UTC, submitted by Unios
Thread beginning with comment 486572
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: The article is about it being a hoax
by Laurence on Wed 24th Aug 2011 09:43
in reply to "RE[3]: The article is about it being a hoax"
I used to think that way. I have a lot more of respect for the guy as a programmer since I read this Joel Spolsky's little story:
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/06/16.html
To be honest I was expecting something more impressive than that. That link doesn't really boast about Bill's history as a programmer.
I know the guy is intelligent and understands technology exceedingly well. I also know (and did even highlight this) that he used to get his hands dirty with code, however that doesn't mean that he was one of the key developers for any of their flagship products, let alone an OS developer. Which is why I raised the point about other OS "developers" being compared against him.
I do have a lot of respect for Bill. I may not like many of his business decisions nor personally a fan of Windows, but I've always had a great deal of respect for him because he had vision and was exceedingly good at what he did.
Edited 2011-08-24 09:47 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-06
He's telling the press that he and his friends have written 52 millionen lines of code in three years, but he won't show it. And the press praises him as the next Bill Gates.
Bill Gates was more a businessman than a software developer. I know he has written software (though I'm sure we'd all like to forget about QBasic), but the majority of stuff in the early days was bought. "
I used to think that way. I have a lot more of respect for the guy as a programmer since I read this Joel Spolsky's little story:
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/06/16.html