Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Aug 2011 13:58 UTC
Legal Breaking news from my swamp home country The Netherlands: the Dutch court has just banned the sales of all Galaxy S, SII and Ace smartphones in the entire European Union. The judge has ruled that Android 2.x violates Apple's 868 patent which covers scrolling through photos on a touchscreen. Only this one patent is violated - the complaints about two other patents as well as the design patents has been thrown out. In other words, the judge did not agree with Apple that Samsung is copying Apple's design. The injunction only covers the Galaxy smartphones, since they run Android 2.x; Android 3.0 does not violate the patent in question, and hence, sales of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 can continue. In fact, only the Gallery application violates the patent in question, and Samsung has already stated it is going to replace this application on all new Galaxy smartphones from now on - sales won't even be interrupted. In other words - two patents thrown out, design stuff rejected, and only one patent complaint upheld which will cause no harm to Samsung. Apple just scored a meaningless victory. The Dutch court order is here. The pictures speak thousands of words.
Thread beginning with comment 486617
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by umad
by umad on Wed 24th Aug 2011 16:13 UTC
umad
Member since:
2011-08-18

Its funny to see the polar opposite headlines:

MDN:
Big win for Apple: Dutch court orders EU-wide preliminary injunction against Samsung Galaxy smartphones

OSN:
Apple Scores Meaningless Dutch Court Victory Against Samsung

Reply Score: 2

RE: Comment by umad
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 24th Aug 2011 16:18 in reply to "Comment by umad"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

Its funny to see the polar opposite headlines:

MDN:
Big win for Apple: Dutch court orders EU-wide preliminary injunction against Samsung Galaxy smartphones

OSN:
Apple Scores Meaningless Dutch Court Victory Against Samsung


The difference is explained easily, even if you ignore the obvious fact that MDN is a massive Apple troll.

First, they have no Dutch editors, we do.
Second, they rely entirely on Florian Mueller, we don't.
Third, MDN is a pile of shit. We are awesome.

Reply Parent Score: 25

RE[2]: Comment by umad
by umad on Wed 24th Aug 2011 21:16 in reply to "RE: Comment by umad"
umad Member since:
2011-08-18

>"The difference is explained easily, even if you ignore the obvious fact that MDN is a massive Apple troll."

I wasn't calling into question the accuracy of OSN's headline however with that said, the same troll status could be argued for this site


"First, they have no Dutch editors, we do."

Does that mean that your content can be called into question because you don't live in the U.S.?



"Second, they rely entirely on Florian Mueller, we don't."

What's your point?



Third, MDN is a pile of shit. We are awesome.

[Source needed]

Edited 2011-08-24 21:25 UTC

Reply Parent Score: -1

RE[2]: Comment by umad
by JAlexoid on Wed 24th Aug 2011 23:56 in reply to "RE: Comment by umad"
JAlexoid Member since:
2009-05-19

On of those times where they didn't read Florian's post fully, thus giving Florian bad rep for their own fault*.
Because even Florian said that it only means that Samsung might need to rearrange their logistics operations at worst and that patent is not valid in a crapload of countries. You can actually read his post on the matter without facepalming....

PS: EPO != EU organization.

* - I'm not saying that FM does not make stupid statements on his blog, but not this time...

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: Comment by umad
by fatjoe on Thu 25th Aug 2011 09:27 in reply to "RE: Comment by umad"
fatjoe Member since:
2010-01-12

I stopped reading at "EU-wide".

If you can't even get the basic facts right in the damn title, you ARE a pile of shit.

Reply Parent Score: 1