Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 25th Aug 2011 12:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 486820
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I predict that the judge will totally ignore Samsung's somewhat desperate maneuver.
Samsung have good reason to be "desperate", Apple are twisting the law to prevent natural competition.
Your tone there almost sounds sympathetic for Apple but I really do think Samsung are the victims here.
How is anyone twisting the law?
Apple brought their iThing to the judge, Samsung brought their sThing to the judge, Apple said 'their sThing looks like our iThing and we there is this here law that says their not allowed to do that', judge said 'I agree.'
No one is twisting any laws here.
]{
PS. I love it how you say that a massive APAC company that generates huge profits by paying substandard wages (by western standards) is 'the victim'.





Member since:
2006-01-01
Apple noted the size difference in the original filing and the judge also actually held both devices last time around.
I predict that the judge will totally ignore Samsung's somewhat desperate maneuver.