Linked by umad on Thu 25th Aug 2011 22:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 487067
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: An initial (somewhat off-topic) point
by atsureki on Fri 26th Aug 2011 20:55
in reply to "RE[5]: An initial (somewhat off-topic) point "
The best recent example was the local Apple fanboy brigade gloating over the discontinuation of WebOS.
I'm continually astonished by the depth and breadth of the anti-Apple trollbook on things that didn't happen being done by boogeymen that don't exist. You can link to anything that has actually happened on the Internet, but you can't link to garbage you dreamed up to fuel your own illusions. So which is it: links or no links?
RE[7]: An initial (somewhat off-topic) point
by BallmerKnowsBest on Mon 29th Aug 2011 14:21
in reply to "RE[6]: An initial (somewhat off-topic) point "
"The best recent example was the local Apple fanboy brigade gloating over the discontinuation of WebOS.
I'm continually astonished by the depth and breadth of the anti-Apple trollbook on things that didn't happen being done by boogeymen that don't exist. "
Wow, that's some persecution complex you have. Better check in your closet & under your bed, there might be anti-Apple trolls hiding there!
You can link to anything that has actually happened on the Internet, but you can't link to garbage you dreamed up to fuel your own illusions.
Yeah, maybe you should at least wait until after the links have fallen off the first page before you start trying to pretend it didn't happen.
So which is it: links or no links?
Should I read it aloud for you too, or do you think you can manage that on your own?
http://www.osnews.com/permalink?486304
And that's not to mention the 15 or so other nearly-identical comments that Tony posted on that article alone, with the same thinly-veiled gloating.




Member since:
2008-06-02
It's also hypocritical for any Apple fanboy to call himself a technology enthusiast, when they're really Apple enthusiasts first. Their mentality is fundamentally at-odds with true enthusiasm for technology, in the same way that fundamentalist religious apologists don't make for very good scientists.
The best recent example was the local Apple fanboy brigade gloating over the discontinuation of WebOS. Real tech enthusiasts don't gloat over the demise of an interesting technology, only fanboys do that.