Linked by umad on Thu 25th Aug 2011 22:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 487119
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by phoudoin
by Soulbender on Fri 26th Aug 2011 21:56
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by phoudoin"
But it's when companies switched to personal computers instead of mainframe terminals (or typewriters, or well paper and pen :-) ) that the personal computers grew
Hmm...I dunno. I'm not sure there's a cause-effect in play here. It could also be the natural evolution of more and more people becoming exposed to computers over time. Companies switched to PC's long before the home computers started to fade. I don't think the PC really started making inroads in the home until it got MCGA/VGA graphics and half-decent sound sometime in the early 90's. The game market for PC's pretty much skyrocketed around this time when PC's suddenly didn't suck for games anymore. Interesting that, again, it was games that fueled the acceptance in the home.
Apple is the only survivor of this period in fact.
Well, IBM too. This fact makes me a bit sad.




Member since:
2006-06-09
You right, indeed.
The pioneer personal computers weren't PC, yes.
But it's when companies switched to personal computers instead of mainframe terminals (or typewriters, or well paper and pen :-) ) that the personal computers grew, and they goes by IBM's PC first to replace IBM terminals, and then PC clones, which in turn made people switched at home to the same kind of computers.
I was an Sinclair Spectrum owner and an Atari ST at this time. These early pioneers didn't survived it. Apple is the only survivor of this period in fact.
Mainstream people, them, began with either a PC at office or, for a few of them, a Mac.