Linked by umad on Thu 25th Aug 2011 22:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 487120
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: The RDF is strong in this one...
by JAlexoid on Sun 28th Aug 2011 19:55
in reply to "RE: The RDF is strong in this one..."
"Without the first mass produces and relatively successful mp3 players we wouldn't have the iPod.
You just said "without the iPod, we wouldn't have the iPod."
I just thought that was kind of funny. "
It's useless reading beyond that point. You do know that iPod wasn't the first MP3 player and it wasn't the first mass market MP3 player.
I bet the rosy tint of RDF will start fading with time... be prepared for a grey world.




Member since:
2006-03-12
You just said "without the iPod, we wouldn't have the iPod."
I just thought that was kind of funny.
Are you suggesting that Windows 95 was actually more stable than... well, anything at all, really, or that preemptive multitasking and dynamic memory were actually killer features on single-user systems with 100MHz CPUs and 8 megs of RAM? Perhaps both?
Sure enough, Microsoft got onboard with the future ("the future" = 1970's Unix) years before Apple was able to, but Windows 95 ran away because it managed to commoditize all the user-facing features of the Mac and become the cheap computer that anyone could use (even if no one could get it to work all the time).
I guess your overall thesis was that Apple wasn't constantly years ahead, and sure enough, there was more than a decade where they weren't technically competitive. But setting aside the parts that are a copy of Unix, how is Windows 95 not a copy of Mac OS? That nifty Start button?