Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 26th Aug 2011 22:06 UTC, submitted by Morgan
Legal And we have another contender for the stupidest technology-related lawsuit of 2011. Do you remember RealNetworks? The scourge of '90s web users? Lucky for us, their horrible media player is no longer a requirement on the web. Also lucky, for those of us who occasionally run into content encoded in any of Real's codecs, there's Real Alternative (download here). Well, apparently, RealNetworks is not happy with Real Alternative (download here), as the US company has completely destroyed the life of the Dutch maintainer of a website who dared to link to Real Alternative (download here).
Thread beginning with comment 487139
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by ilovebeer
by Thom_Holwerda on Fri 26th Aug 2011 22:48 UTC in reply to "Comment by ilovebeer"
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

It's all about fitting punishment. You don't destroy a person's life for something as silly as this. This is not a fitting punishment. I don't believe in eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth.

I guess I'm from a different culture.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: Comment by ilovebeer
by bhtooefr on Fri 26th Aug 2011 22:57 in reply to "RE: Comment by ilovebeer"
bhtooefr Member since:
2009-02-19

This isn't even an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.

This is a limb for a minor cut.

Reply Parent Score: 13

RE[3]: Comment by ilovebeer
by M.Onty on Sat 27th Aug 2011 17:27 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by ilovebeer"
M.Onty Member since:
2009-10-23

... Or a pound of flesh, perhaps.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Comment by ilovebeer
by Morgan on Sat 27th Aug 2011 08:11 in reply to "RE: Comment by ilovebeer"
Morgan Member since:
2005-06-29

That was my mindset when I submitted it. Why is this guy's life being destroyed over an intangible, and at this stage in RealNetworks' business plan, unprofitable product? They stopped supporting the version of the Real codec that Real Alternative uses a long time ago, and likely never really profited much on it in the past several years.

Yet they are causing an immense hardship to this young man, basically destroying his life, and even if they win they could never possibly collect damages from him as they have already bankrupted him in legal fees.

I don't care if he created Real Alternative, hosted it or just linked to it, none of those actions warrant the kind of gross financial destruction he has already suffered, before the trial is even over. I sincerely hope he wins and the judge orders RealNetworks to make him whole.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: Comment by ilovebeer
by steogede2 on Sat 27th Aug 2011 09:04 in reply to "RE: Comment by ilovebeer"
steogede2 Member since:
2007-08-17

I don't believe in eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth.


The whole point of "an eye for an eye", was to limit retribution - to have an even, fair and balanced justice system. There's nothing even, fair or balanced about what Real Networks are doing to this guy. It is amazing that he is accused of no crime (it is a civil case), but the impact on his life is worse than it would be if he had been convicted of a serious crime.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Comment by ilovebeer
by No it isnt on Sat 27th Aug 2011 09:37 in reply to "RE: Comment by ilovebeer"
No it isnt Member since:
2005-11-14

Forcing him to use RealPlayer should be punishment enough.

Reply Parent Score: 11