Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 2nd Sep 2011 21:47 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 488361
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
If it turns out Apple is in the wrong, then they should reap the consequences. Isn't there a innocent until proven guilty in the US?
That is correct, however, say that in the circumstance of the person who had their home violated without a warrant. by the government.
Was he guilty of a crime? No. Was he manipulated by law enforcement and Apple employees to gain access to the house? Yes.
So in his circumstance, he was guilty before innocent. Did he have the phone? No.




Member since:
2005-07-11
I don't understand, if the Police where there, then they obviously allowed the Apple employee's to enter the house to help with the search.
If anyone is at fault here, it's the police department for allowing the Apple employee's in. Maybe the police asked the employee's to help find the prototype, perhaps the prototype looks very much like and iPhone 4 or even 3GS etc...
I think again WE are all jumping up and down trying to be anti Apple without all the facts. Once ALL the facts are in, then maybe we should comment on such things...
If it turns out Apple is in the wrong, then they should reap the consequences. Isn't there a innocent until proven guilty in the US?
Honestly, even though I love Apple stuff (mainly), I am not trying to back what Apple may or may not have done, just saying, lets wait until the jury is in... I am sure most of us here would hate to be misinterpreted by the press, I am sure most of us here have knowledge on how easily facts are thrown away to make a great story...