Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 1st Sep 2011 21:48 UTC, submitted by glarepate
Thread beginning with comment 488385
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Right back atcha: You clearly don't get it ...
by JAlexoid on Sun 4th Sep 2011 22:18
in reply to "RE[4]: Right back atcha: You clearly don't get it ..."
Non-discriminatory means that you can't say no just because you want to say no. Fair and reasonable is the part that governs compensation.
See the result of Nokia vs Apple - it's definitely not equal to everyone else*, yet non-discriminatory.
* - the biggest indicator that it's not equal to everyone else is the fact that the terms are not public.




Member since:
2005-07-06
the ND stands for non-discriminatory
in my book thats the same as equal in this context
Edited 2011-09-03 23:46 UTC