Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 9th Sep 2011 15:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 489094
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-10-09
I've noticed also that Windows depends heavily on disk access speed. The proof is that as soon as you defragment the Windows system files the overall system responsiveness increases massively. This means, that while using the Windows - like opening explorer, coying files, etc - windows every time accesses its DLL-s and it likes to read them from the disk. INSANE. If you have your shell, kernel and user DLL files in 20 pieces, those pieces are grabbed together gazillion times a day and that mans slow response time. I don't understand why MS does not use its cached copies of DLLs and accesses them from the disk.
Edited 2011-09-10 08:38 UTC