Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 9th Sep 2011 15:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 489242
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: They always promise this
by lucas_maximus on Mon 12th Sep 2011 21:21
in reply to "RE[7]: They always promise this"
No it doesn't. More code != better engineers. They moght be, but the number of lines of code says nothing about how good the engineering is. If anything, it's the opposite.
I didn't say that more code != better engineers ... what I said that a large code base got ported easily.
The big thing about NT is the HAL layer pretty much proves that the whole code is well modularized ... which is what I alluded to.
"freedoms". That's clever. or not.
How this for a reason: I think it sucks and it hampers my work productivity.
How this for a reason: I think it sucks and it hampers my work productivity.
How exactly? I have never seen a convincing argument that working with an Open Source bit of code is actually better than closed source ... Crap code is crap code whether it is open or closed.
I don't like shifting through fuck loads of someone else's code to fix it. I rather it just bloody work in the first place ... whether it is open or not is irrelevant.
That's just a valid reason for me as "many people use it without problems".
Not really.
RE[9]: They always promise this
by lucas_maximus on Mon 12th Sep 2011 21:54
in reply to "RE[8]: They always promise this"




Member since:
2005-08-18
No it doesn't. More code != better engineers. They moght be, but the number of lines of code says nothing about how good the engineering is. If anything, it's the opposite.
"freedoms". That's clever. or not.
How this for a reason: I think it sucks and it hampers my work productivity.
That's just a valid reason for me as "many people use it without problems".