Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 17th Sep 2011 00:19 UTC
Linux "Many Linux distributions have taken the path of easy GUI-based installation, in order to appeal to a broader mix of users. But not Arch Linux, which emphasises simplicity of technical complexity over general usability. Richard Hillesley explains."
Thread beginning with comment 489893
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:


pacman is terrible, AUR is worst

Better get Gentoo is you want a flexible distribution. It has the best, but the slowest package manager.

Reply Parent Score: 2

lucas_maximus Member since:

Portage is quite good IMO. I think there was a distro that was using NetBSD's pkgsrc ... but I forget it's name.

My favourite package tools are OpenBSD's ... I find they very simple to use. Ports system works flawlessly to.

I am mainly like Redhat based stuff since I used to look after a server room of CENTOS servers. So I don't mind YUM ... I am sure some people hate it.

Edited 2011-09-17 05:12 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

foregam Member since:

Portage is quite good IMO. I think there was a distro that was using NetBSD's pkgsrc...

There're several such distros in fact, all of them Slackware based: Dracolinux, Voltalinux, Blackmouse... It's a real killer combo. I've tried Arch and Gentoo (portage depends on python, WTF?! If I wanted YUM (quite decent actually) I know where to get it.) but none comes close to that. Source Mage seems promising.

Edited 2011-09-17 09:11 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 0

ghostdawg Member since:

I believe you are referring to Crux Linux. It was based on Slackware and Arch if I'm not mistaken.

Arch is a pretty good distro but I haven't used it in some years.

Reply Parent Score: 1

Bill Shooter of Bul Member since:

Portage is good, its the packages that are created for portage that suck. Compile directives are often changed from one minor version of a package to another without any explanation or warning. You have to be pretty careful emerging a new version of a package. Which, can be pretty painstakingly difficult when a ton of dependances are attached.

Reply Parent Score: 2

gelendir Member since:

This is just plain troll bait. The problem was fixed ages ago. We could also go on about how gentoo messed up more than once with the libpng fiasco, eh ? Bottom line, every distro has had its hiccups. (Gentoo and Arch included)

Reply Parent Score: 1

Zbigniew Member since:

The best package manager is... no package manager. Hint: Gobolinux.
If not Gobo-solution - there's always possibility to use Zeroinstall. Why the package managers, when actually there's no need?

Reply Parent Score: 1