To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Portage is quite good IMO. I think there was a distro that was using NetBSD's pkgsrc ... but I forget it's name.
My favourite package tools are OpenBSD's ... I find they very simple to use. Ports system works flawlessly to.
I am mainly like Redhat based stuff since I used to look after a server room of CENTOS servers. So I don't mind YUM ... I am sure some people hate it.
Edited 2011-09-17 05:12 UTC
There're several such distros in fact, all of them Slackware based: Dracolinux, Voltalinux, Blackmouse... It's a real killer combo. I've tried Arch and Gentoo (portage depends on python, WTF?! If I wanted YUM (quite decent actually) I know where to get it.) but none comes close to that. Source Mage seems promising.
Edited 2011-09-17 09:11 UTC
Portage is good, its the packages that are created for portage that suck. Compile directives are often changed from one minor version of a package to another without any explanation or warning. You have to be pretty careful emerging a new version of a package. Which, can be pretty painstakingly difficult when a ton of dependances are attached.





Member since:
2006-06-12
+1
pacman is terrible, AUR is worst
Better get Gentoo is you want a flexible distribution. It has the best, but the slowest package manager.