Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Sep 2011 22:06 UTC, submitted by kragil
Thread beginning with comment 490374
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-12
Of course the OS can be modified. How else would you be able to do a windows update or install a servicepack that fixes kernel problems and exploits? It is just a matter of time before that security layer is broken and windows clients is as infected as they ever were before. The only side to this that makes sense for me is the argument of locking other OS'es out and securing the microsoft monopoly for a while longer.
Once it is backwards engineered (as that is legal in all countries) though it is fair game for all, and considering the number of hackers on x86 compared to code-monkeys that hacks on consoles, i would bet a legal backwards engineering effort would be set up fast and succeed in a rather short time.
In other words, i do not worry too much.