Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Sep 2011 22:06 UTC, submitted by kragil
Windows After the walled garden coming to the desktop operating system world, we're currently witnessing another potential nail in the coffin of the relatively open world of desktop and laptop computing. Microsoft has revealed [.pptx] that as part of its Windows 8 logo program, OEMs must implement UEFI secure boot. This could potentially complicate the installation of other operating systems, like Windows 7, XP, and Linux.
Thread beginning with comment 490401
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment from a dumb user
by Soulbender on Thu 22nd Sep 2011 20:28 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment from a dumb user"
Soulbender
Member since:
2005-08-18

That's insane. I knew there was a good reason I don't use Windows 7. Well, that and the fact that Windows 7 provides nothing whatsoever that I need.

It should be obvious that giving MS the benefit of doubt regarding this secure boot thing is not a good idea. At all.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Alfman Member since:
2011-01-28

Soulbender,

Most users aren't affected, but for those who are..it's devastating. A whole lot of alternative file systems were effectively banned in vista, which was my interest in writing windows drivers prior the lockdown.

OpenAFS, a fairly popular distributed network FS, had one clever yet insane workaround for windows clients. They enable the user to map drives by implementing a virtual SMB server running on the local host which acts as a translating proxy between the windows SMB stack and remote AFS nodes. Now of course such a thing can be made to work, but it's restrictions like this that make windows intolerable. It's my computer, let me do as I damn well please.

Edited 2011-09-22 21:10 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3