Linked by David Adams on Mon 19th Sep 2011 16:51 UTC, submitted by estherschindler
Thread beginning with comment 490413
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: RISC dominates where no BC needed
by JLF65 on Fri 23rd Sep 2011 15:46
in reply to "RE[7]: RISC dominates where no BC needed"
The same one I made in the original post with one caveat - without the need for BC, x86 would not dominate any market with the exception, perhaps, of the high end. Even there, x86 only dominates because the middle and low end pushed the x86 along and provided the money needed to do the R&D for high end chips. ANY PLACE BC ISN'T NEEDED EXCEPT THE HIGH END is now dominated by RISC, with the examples being set top boxes, consoles, handhelds, PDAs, netbooks, smart phones, etc. CLEARLY x86 only dominates in areas where BC is the major concern of BUSINESSES.




Member since:
2009-03-17
And if my grandma had balls we would have called her grandpa.
What is your point exactly?