Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Sep 2011 22:22 UTC, submitted by kragil
Windows The story about how secure boot for Windows 8, part of UEFI, will hinder the use of non-signed binaries and operating systems, like Linux, has registered at Redmond as well. The company posted about it on the Building Windows 8 blog - but didn't take any of the worries away. In fact, Red Hat's Matthew Garrett, who originally broke this story, has some more information - worst of which is that Red Hat has received confirmation from hardware vendors that some of them will not allow you to disable secure boot.
Thread beginning with comment 490591
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: open efi etc
by pgeorgi on Sat 24th Sep 2011 08:17 UTC in reply to "open efi etc"
pgeorgi
Member since:
2010-02-18

The guys at coreboot.org certainly saw this coming though. Might be an idea to put this "army of hackers" - that Tsuroerusu referred to - on designing / improving a BSD/GPL licensed EFI that is vastly superior (the BIOS powers of old aren't that well known for their interfaces / features etc.) to this closed, mysterious and frightening code that will be running on a lot of machines.

The problem isn't features - we at coreboot.org could crank out them by the week. The main issue is hardware support, and in particular with Intel and nVidia hardware, things look bleak.

As for EFI: www.tianocore.org - we could really use someone who's willing to make this a coreboot payload.

BTW: I would love to encounter an error message whilst installing Linux/FreeBSD on a piece of new hardware, calling the supplier and telling him his server is broken ;) . Ofc, professional server manufacturers would want their devices to be "safe" as well, wouldn't they ;) ?

Even more fun: Manage to install Linux with your own keys, then complain with Microsoft support that Windows 8 doesn't install :-)

Reply Parent Score: 3