Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Sep 2011 22:22 UTC, submitted by kragil
Thread beginning with comment 490616
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
noamsmi,
"I think you're missing the point. I'm sure most OSNews users are fine with UEFI -- it's a great feature. However, it's only a feature if it can be turned off."
Well, there are three issues that I've picked up on so far. In order of significance, they are:
1. Turn the flag off to boot alternative OS at all.
2. The ability to dual boot linux and windows without reconfiguring the bios each time.
3. The ability to actually use the feature under linux instead of merely disabling it.
Even if secure boot can be disabled, linux users still have legitimate concerns about the other two unnecessary restrictions built into the computer.




Member since:
2005-07-09
I think you're missing the point. I'm sure most OSNews users are fine with UEFI -- it's a great feature. However, it's only a feature if it can be turned off. Think of it like this: Cake is great. I love cake. Sometimes I want to eat cake, and sometimes I want to eat things that aren't cake. If someone gives me cake, I'll probably enjoy it. If someone gives me cake and then stops me from eating anything else ever, I'd be pretty upset. And in poor health.