Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Sep 2011 22:22 UTC, submitted by kragil
Thread beginning with comment 490743
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-10
To the best of my limited knowledge, most newer implementations of UEFI are 64 bit, so DOS recovery tools wouldn't work anyway as the system wouldn't have real-mode available. I could be wrong.
Also to the best of my limited knowledge, most people would be using Windows Recovery Console for OS repair, assuming of course they don't just take the machine into the shop to have it fixed.
As long as there is an option to disable the feature, I'm personally fine with it. Implemented properly, It is a good idea. The best thing one who is interested in alternative software can do is make sure they only buy machines that have the option to disable UEFI secure boot/have the ability in the firmware setup to add/remove keys.