Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Sep 2011 22:22 UTC, submitted by kragil
Thread beginning with comment 490778
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yet another GPL/RMS fail.
You can't even sign compiled GPL code? Wow.
There comes a time when a license is too restrictive to be of use.
Instead of Linux fanboys demanding that everyone else live within the restrictions of RMS/GPL religion, why not dump GPL and pick a different OSI-approved open source license?





Member since:
2005-07-14
So... why don't we start signing Linux kernels (or even just the boot loaders)? Surely someone like RedHat could easily contribute a signing authority?
- chrish