Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Sep 2011 08:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 490865
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: an unanswered question
by mksoft on Tue 27th Sep 2011 09:28
in reply to "RE[2]: an unanswered question"
But that's not what MPEG-LA are doing. They require a license from every vendor in production chain (hardware, software editors, publishers beyond certain values).
And Apple are supporting and pushing this N-dippings behavior with their codec support for the video tag in html5 standard.
Their actions of Pushing N-dipping into the HTML standard is worst then FRNAD double dipping (which again, not sure if that's the case here). Hypocrisy ?




Member since:
2011-08-18
BTW, isn't this exactly what MPEG-LA are doing - Apple is a licensor and licensee ?
Yes and there's nothing wrong with being a licensor and licensee in Samsung's or Apple's case. Owning FRAND patents simply means you need to offer low reasonable licensing terms. Not paying those doesn't cause ANY increased liability. Rather, it simply requires that you pay and back pay as required.
If you get a license by way of utilizing another's product then you are observed from any payment whatsoever as it was already paid for.