To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
And Chrome inflating itself to version 14 (and updating itself far more often) is surely "twice as worse" than Firefox is? It is interesting to note how Mozilla is beginning to "hide" the version numbers of its products - the download buttons no longer reveal the version and if they could remove it from the "About..." box, I bet they would!
However, although they've been copying some of Chrome's features recently (and not all the copied Chrome ideas have been good ones, mind you), Mozilla has yet to copy the idea of "silent updating" that Chrome uses. This is why you see people whine incessantly about new Firefox releases (normally every 6-8 weeks unless there's an emergency fix) and no-one complains about the many more updates Chrome gets (every 2 weeks typically).
Also don't forget that IE on Windows often gets a monthly update as part of the "Patch Tuesday" - again, more often than Firefox, but no-one complains about that either (mainly because MS don't bother changing the major version number and it's "bundled" with a bunch other updates, which are often all automatically applied).
So, yes, Firefox increases its major version number at about the same rate as Chrome, but like Chrome, just learn to ignore the version number really. I think Mozilla should have done a year.release version scheme (e.g. 2011.01 for the first release of the year and so on - gives them 99 releases [which could include alphas and betas inbetween stable releases] a year, which should be more than enough). That way, no-one would moan about the major version changing because that would only happen at least 12 months apart!
But that means that they would go from 7 to 2011. Inflation of almost 3000%!
I have here an 8Gb, Win7 64, quad Phenom box and have it installed Firefox 7.0. As a Google Chrome user, I tested firefox right away, doing my usual browsing habits opening tabs, typing a search query, then it suddenly very slow, I can't even click the tabs and I have to wait for 10 to 15 secs. I have never experience this in Google Chrome, unless there are too many tabs I may experience slowness.
Forget about the memory reduction, it ain't useful when it will compromise stability. Stability is more important to users. Now I'm back again at Google Chrome. When time is wasted, it is turn off.
No, there was a time you could look at the version number and tell if there were some major changes or not. You know, things like major compatibility and UI changes. Firefox's version number has only recently become "completely arbitrary"... since, what, Firefox 4, 5? Never mind the whole incompatible extensions mess that is brought to extreme levels with these rapid version number inflations.
Edited 2011-09-27 22:48 UTC





Member since:
2006-12-05
...yet another f***ing inflated version number.