Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Sep 2011 15:36 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless This is the biggest one yet. Microsoft's professional extortion campaign - the third side of the same triangle it shares with Apple and Oracle - has finally hit Samsung. The two companies have signed a patent licensing agreement concerning Samsung's use of Android, in which a rumoured fee of $15 (!) per device will flow from Seoul to Redmond. Not entirely coincidentally, that's about the price of a Windows Phone 7 license.
Thread beginning with comment 491077
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
kristoph
Member since:
2006-01-01

Amazon can build an entirely non-Google Android and (probably) sell millions of copies. And yet, Fusion Garage can experiment with Android and build and entirely non-Google experience.


Android 2.x was certainly open source by any reasonable definition. Both the Amazon product, the Fusion Garage product and the Baidu fork/version is 2.x based.

Google closed the source as of Android 3 (Honeycomb). Google said they will release the source in the future but it has, to date, seen the light of day (that I know of)

Hopefully 3.1 will once again become open when it's released in November but there is no news on that as of yet.

Reply Parent Score: 2

zima Member since:
2005-07-06

Hopefully 3.1 will once again become open when it's released in November but there is no news on that as of yet.

That's bordering on a lie (again?...); Google was quite clear about the reasons for keeping tablet-only version closed, and even clearer, repeatedly, about the next version having its source released.

Reply Parent Score: 2