Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th Sep 2011 20:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 491231
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Oh well, that's also sometimes the result of being the pioneer, I guess - when the idea is not yet clarified fully, not yet refined...
And there are still billions of subscribers with phones which can't run ever Opera Mini (S30 class devices), there should be place for such browser for quite some time. Either way, Opera so far is profitable and on a healthy, sustained rise (also during recent economic turmoil; they are a publicly traded company, you can check their financials)




Member since:
2008-01-07
Well, then I must say I chose the wrong word there.
I use opera mini on my ipod touch at home even when I have it connected to my WiFi; so I know how useful it gets. Even on snappy networks it can get snappier -- the execution I'm talking about is the polish and marketting, rather. Take speed dial of opera vs chrome; or browser sync, or pretty much any awesome concept that has me stuck using it. It works, but it lacks polish until a competitor picks it up.
As for marketshare -- the "completely different devices" -- that's my primary issue. It feels like people are content with it being the niche browser. All markets will slowly migrate to smartphones (I live in india, so I can fairly say I have some idea) and I rarely see people use opera mini on their 'droids.
Edited 2011-09-30 00:52 UTC