To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Due to patents held by Microsoft on its .NET technology, the availability of two .NET implementations (Mono and DotGNU) under free software licenses doesn't mean that free software developers should, according to RMS, write code for the platform. His call on the free software community: "You shouldn't write software to use .NET. No exceptions." RMS says that Microsoft could one day use patents against free .NET implementations.
http://www.fsf.org/news/2009-07-mscp-mono
So the Microsoft Community Promise dosent exist?
http://www.microsoft.com/openspecifications/en/us/programs/communit...
C# Language Specification - Ecma-334, 4th Edition and ISO/IEC 23270:2006
Common Language Infrastructure (CLI) - Ecma-335, 4th Edition and ISO/IEC 23271:2006





Member since:
2008-10-30
Yet the mono apps were some of the few that actually worked as advertised.
So sabotaging by providing working apps....
I see what you did there.