Linked by David Adams on Thu 29th Sep 2011 23:47 UTC, submitted by lucas_maximus
Thread beginning with comment 491272
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So the Microsoft Community Promise dosent exist?
http://www.microsoft.com/openspecifications/en/us/programs/communit...
C# Language Specification - Ecma-334, 4th Edition and ISO/IEC 23270:2006
Common Language Infrastructure (CLI) - Ecma-335, 4th Edition and ISO/IEC 23271:2006
So the Microsoft Community Promise dosent exist? http://www.microsoft.com/openspecifications/en/us/programs/communit... C# Language Specification - Ecma-334, 4th Edition and ISO/IEC 23270:2006 Common Language Infrastructure (CLI) - Ecma-335, 4th Edition and ISO/IEC 23271:2006
http://www.gnu.org/s/dotgnu/
DotGNU Portable.NET, an implementation of the Common Language Infrastructure (CLI), more commonly known as ".NET", includes everything that you need to compile and run C# and C applications that use the base class libraries, XML, and Systems.Windows.Forms.
The Microsoft Community Promise certainly doesn't exist for Systems.Windows.Forms. I beleive also that it doesn't exist for .NET XML.
So the Microsoft Community Promise dosent exist?
http://www.microsoft.com/openspecifications/en/us/programs/communit...
C# Language Specification - Ecma-334, 4th Edition and ISO/IEC 23270:2006
Common Language Infrastructure (CLI) - Ecma-335, 4th Edition and ISO/IEC 23271:2006
http://www.microsoft.com/openspecifications/en/us/programs/communit...
C# Language Specification - Ecma-334, 4th Edition and ISO/IEC 23270:2006
Common Language Infrastructure (CLI) - Ecma-335, 4th Edition and ISO/IEC 23271:2006
The problem is that those specifications only cover up to C# version 2.0 and CLI v 2.0. You are out of luck if you search for a language standard for newer C# versions or CLI.





Member since:
2010-09-01
Due to patents held by Microsoft on its .NET technology, the availability of two .NET implementations (Mono and DotGNU) under free software licenses doesn't mean that free software developers should, according to RMS, write code for the platform. His call on the free software community: "You shouldn't write software to use .NET. No exceptions." RMS says that Microsoft could one day use patents against free .NET implementations.
http://www.fsf.org/news/2009-07-mscp-mono