Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Sep 2011 15:36 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless This is the biggest one yet. Microsoft's professional extortion campaign - the third side of the same triangle it shares with Apple and Oracle - has finally hit Samsung. The two companies have signed a patent licensing agreement concerning Samsung's use of Android, in which a rumoured fee of $15 (!) per device will flow from Seoul to Redmond. Not entirely coincidentally, that's about the price of a Windows Phone 7 license.
Thread beginning with comment 491460
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: .
by ilovebeer on Fri 30th Sep 2011 16:19 UTC in reply to "."
ilovebeer
Member since:
2011-08-08

Anyway, wasn't it rumoured that HTC is only paying $1-2 per device? How'd Samsung screw up negotiations so badly? The thought of $1-2 of my money going to MS is hard enough to stomach, now I'm not sure I could bring myself to buy a Samsung Android phone.


Why exactly are you so emotionally invested? Are you a shareholder? Have family members that work for these companies? If your just a mere end-user then you should really remove yourself from what HTC pays as it has absolutely no affect on your life what-so-ever. If you need something to spend your time & energy on, find a good charity and have at it.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: .
by tomcat on Fri 30th Sep 2011 18:13 in reply to "RE: ."
tomcat Member since:
2006-01-06

Why exactly are you so emotionally invested? Are you a shareholder? Have family members that work for these companies? If your just a mere end-user then you should really remove yourself from what HTC pays as it has absolutely no affect on your life what-so-ever. If you need something to spend your time & energy on, find a good charity and have at it.


Because his sense of self-worth seems to be derived from what he carries around with him in his pocket.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: .
by Icaria on Sat 1st Oct 2011 05:32 in reply to "RE: ."
Icaria Member since:
2010-06-19

Why exactly are you so emotionally invested?


Through what warped-arse interpretation of my post did you get the impression that I'm emotionally invested?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: .
by ilovebeer on Sat 1st Oct 2011 07:24 in reply to "RE[2]: ."
ilovebeer Member since:
2011-08-08

Through what warped-arse interpretation of my post did you get the impression that I'm emotionally invested?


Quite simply the part where you displayed emotional attachment: "The thought of $1-2 of my money going to MS is hard enough to stomach, now I'm not sure I could bring myself to buy a Samsung Android phone."

It's beyond me why a person with no actual interests in these companies take their licensing agreement so serious as to not be sure they could "bring themselves (you) to buy a Samsung Android phone".

Maybe I'm old-fashioned or crazy but all I'm concerned with is 1) does the phone suit my needs, and 2) am I comfortable with the price. I couldn't care less if $1-2 of my no-longer-mine dollars goes to Microsoft or hookers & booze, and you shouldn't care either. There are plenty of worthy causes to spend your time on -- this isn't one of them, seriously.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: .
by zima on Wed 5th Oct 2011 23:51 in reply to "RE: ."
zima Member since:
2005-07-06

Don't be obtuse (and that goes for the thread beside). Or are you really so blissfully unaware how interconnected the societies are?

People who don't care where their money goes, as long as they feel good about their (any) new toys (this, and how consumers justify post-factum the prices to themselves, leads also to the waste of positional or veblen goods BTW), when even a choice of "lesser evil" is quite straightforward, are a major push behind most of the harm in the world. Paying lip-service and throwing change to some random charities, to feel better about yourself, doesn't make too much of a difference.

That sad state of the world certainly does fall under what you even bold nearby, is certainly "old-fashioned" and "crazy" ...small steps (starting where it's easy, getting used to it, and going further from there) could start really changing it down the line. If there are enough people doing them, it could eventually really change the stakes in the world (and BTW - taxes, how they are used, and govs themselves, are a collective reflection of our own desires).
Or you can just cowardly escape from that responsibility.

And one piece of trivia - BillG, on the power afforded by MS and its fortunes, pushes western-style IP rights onto developing world under the guise of help. Which will have a direct impact for example on the future availability of crucially important, inexpensive generic medicines.

Reply Parent Score: 2