Linked by David Adams on Thu 29th Sep 2011 23:47 UTC, submitted by lucas_maximus
Linux Linux is struggling on the desktop because it only has a small number of "great" apps, according to the Gnome co-creator. Miguel de Icaza, co-creator of the Gnome desktop, told tech journalist Tim Anderson at the recent Windows 8 Build conference "When you count how many great desktop apps there are on Linux, you can probably name 10," de Icaza said, according to a post on Anderson's IT Writing blog. "You work really hard, you can probably name 20. We've managed to p*** off developers every step of the way, breaking APIs all the time."
Thread beginning with comment 491509
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Misleading article title
by dnebdal on Fri 30th Sep 2011 18:34 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Misleading article title"
Member since:

Not to mention that current Linux graphics stack is a total resource hog*.

* - If you disagree, then tell me why my powerful desktop box with latest nVidia drivers(which are quite good on Linux) uses 2x more CPU to project any video onto the screen, than Windows(anything post XP) installed on an Atom N270?

It could be that the windows side does more on the GPU than the Linux side? The hogginess of the display layer isn't the most important factor if the Windows side does more of the actual video decoding on the GPU.

Reply Parent Score: 1

JAlexoid Member since:

If I were stupid, I would have tested it with an accelerated video format. But since I'm not, I tested with universally unaccelerated WebM.
Why does it take 20% of a CPU core to project a video stream in X? It's not the constant % of CPU X uses, but the jump while playing video...
On Atom N270 with GMA950 anything in 720p and up is not even worth trying in Linux, while Windows manages to play 720p files, without any acceleration.

PS: Windows XP does not do it's graphics on the GPU. And I tested with Win7 and WinXP.

Reply Parent Score: 2