Linked by M-Saunders on Fri 30th Sep 2011 19:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 491657
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Except that Linus did not choose linux as the project name, but it was one of his friend:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Linux#The_name
Except that Linus did not choose linux as the project name, but it was one of his friend:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Linux#The_name
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Linux#The_name
Do you really believe that story?
If I had created something, then it is my creation, and I name it. Not someone else. As we have seen, Linus bosses around with people and he is in charge, insulting people if he dont like what they do, scaring off developers. Do you really believe that such a person with such an ego would let someone else name his creation - or is it more plausible that he named his creation after himself? What is more probable?
1) Person with huge ego names it after himself
2) Person with huge ego let other persons decide over his creation.






Member since:
2007-07-27
It's all about branding anyway.
Well, Linus Torvalds started the trend of name one's creation after himself, so Mike did the same thing.
Stallman said "I am not the one who names my creation as Stallmanix" - critizing Linus.