To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, quoting is a part of argumentation, and what you chose to quote (and highlight) is a claim that the Verizon iPhone outsells Android devices (whether combined or not remains unclear) on the Verizon network. In my opinion, this metric is not so good from many points of view, but most noticeably because it is more of an iOS vs Android metric than a Verizon vs AT&T one.
I do not live in the US and some of the mobile network choices there are beyond me (two incompatible cell standards ? lolwut ?), but it is my understanding that the Verizon iPhone was supposed to change everything because the Verizon network is supposedly much better than the AT&T one, which would have made AT&T exclusivity cripple iPhone sales. It seems to me that in order to study this, a good metric should somehow compare the attractivity of Verizon and AT&T for the iPhone buyer population. Which is apparently pretty much equal, even in favor of AT&T.
Edited 2011-10-05 06:53 UTC




Member since:
2010-03-08
I think Thom was referring to another part of the same article :
"On Friday, while reporting its quarterly earnings results, Verizon said it activated 2.3 million iPhones during the company’s second quarter. That is a hefty figure, because the device has been available on Verizon for only a few months, but it paled in comparison to AT&T’s iPhone activations for the same quarter. On Thursday, AT&T reported that it had activated 3.6 million iPhones on its network, and that nearly a quarter of them were for new customers to AT&T."
In short : only half of *new* US iPhone customers buy it from Verizon, showing that AT&T was not so much of a problem after all, in sense that the huge customer rush from AT&T to Verizon that some were expecting didn't happen.
I don't know why you're bringing Android on the table, but from the data I have it seems to me that it's doing fine in its corner, since its introduction at the end of 2008. If a major OS manufacturer would have to worry in the US, that would rather be RIM : http://gs.statcounter.com/#mobile_os-na-monthly-200812-201110
Edited 2011-10-04 07:37 UTC