Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Oct 2011 13:31 UTC
Legal A few days ago, several countries signed ACTA, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. As you are probably aware, ACTA was drafted up in secret, and is basically Obama/Biden's attempt to impose the US' draconian pro-big business/big content protection laws on the rest of the world ('sign it, or else'). The European Parliament still has to vote on it, and as such, Douwe Korff, professor of international law at the London Metropolitan University, and Ian Brown senior research fellow at the University of Oxford, performed a 90-page study, with a harsh conclusion: ACTA violates fundamental human rights.
Thread beginning with comment 491892
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Call me contrarian...
by howitzer86 on Wed 5th Oct 2011 04:33 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Call me contrarian..."
howitzer86
Member since:
2008-02-27

Arguably, it isn't illegal to watch DVDs on Linux using VLC. One has paid for the optical DVD drive, one has paid for the DVD, and one has a license to run the VLC software. When one buys a DVD player and a DVD, one expects to be able to play it. "Playing" is what DVDs are meant for, afetr all, so the right to play them is implicit in the sale transaction.

The VLC software itself is not a copy of any other software, and it does not employ "stolen" keys nor any other information other than what is on the DVD itself. The decoding library (called libdvdcss) written and used by VLC has never been challenged in court. The VLC software does not have a "copy DVD" function, it is a player not a copier. The encoding used by DVDs is very weak, it is neither novel nor original, so it shouldn't have any patents applicable to it.

Why should it be illegal to watch a DVD on Linux using VLC?

No one who suggests it is illegal is ever able to explain what law has allegedly been breached by such an act.


You can rip DVDs with VLC by streaming them to a file. VLC also must have some kind of copy protection workaround because it's able to play and stream copy protected DVDs.

Having said that, it's still not something that will get you in trouble. This isn't a Orwellian police state, the FBI aren't going to know what you used to play a DVD with and frankly they don't care. They'll care if you start selling bootlegs. So ultimately it has to do with what you do with this software rather than the software itself.

ACTA sucks, but chances are you aren't going to be affected by it. Especially if you're a US citizen.

Edited 2011-10-05 04:34 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

jabbotts Member since:
2007-09-06

Fair Use granted by Copyright to the content license holder says I pay to license the content not the medium it is delivered on. It also says that I can, for private use, access that content any way I like. Music comes on CD, I can legally convert it to mp3 to enjoy using my digital music player. Movies come on DVD, I can legally convert it to a digital format to vew though digital media players.

But boy howdy does big content put a lot of effort and lobbying into trying to remove fair use from copyright so they can sell me the same content license over and over on different storage mediums.

Reply Parent Score: 3

jackeebleu Member since:
2006-01-26

So all the movies, music, audio books, et al, showing up on the interwebs is just "fair-use" right not "theft"? Last I checked the RIAA wasn't going after people that burned their movies/music/for use in the comfort of their own home...unless one lives in a bit torrent site.

So please stop this facade about fair use and how evil corporations are. Enjoy your product for your personal use and you'll have no problem. Whats the issue?

Reply Parent Score: 1