Linked by Moochman on Fri 7th Oct 2011 20:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 492329
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Why is Java 'wrong' on the desktop?
by Nelson on Sat 8th Oct 2011 15:48
in reply to "Why is Java 'wrong' on the desktop?"
RE[2]: Why is Java 'wrong' on the desktop?
by ggeldenhuys on Sat 8th Oct 2011 16:41
in reply to "RE: Why is Java 'wrong' on the desktop?"
RE: Why is Java 'wrong' on the desktop?
by BluenoseJake on Sat 8th Oct 2011 16:31
in reply to "Why is Java 'wrong' on the desktop?"
RE[2]: Why is Java 'wrong' on the desktop?
by ggeldenhuys on Sat 8th Oct 2011 16:46
in reply to "RE: Why is Java 'wrong' on the desktop?"
RE[2]: Why is Java 'wrong' on the desktop?
by Moochman on Sat 8th Oct 2011 17:35
in reply to "RE: Why is Java 'wrong' on the desktop?"
I've used both extensively, and can honestly say that this kind of hyperbole is just a lot of hot air. While it's true that the GUI design tools are better than what's available for Java, when it comes to pure code editing and navigation I find the Java-based IDEs to be nicer. Eclipse and NetBeans at the least equal VS in this regard, while IntelliJ pretty much beats it.





Member since:
2006-11-19
The vast majority of Windows apps are written with .Net, which is basically the same type of system as Java (memory managed byte code runs in a jit'ed env).
So, why is .Net great for desktop apps, but Java is considered bad?
Personally, the app I use 90% of the time is Eclipse (for C++/Python/Fortran) and I think its fantastic.