Linked by Moochman on Fri 7th Oct 2011 20:50 UTC
Java In the midst of the dual events Oracle OpenWorld and JavaOne (overshadowed, of course, by the iPhone event) Oracle took a number of steps that show that they still care about making a go of Java on the desktop.
Thread beginning with comment 492329
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Why is Java 'wrong' on the desktop?
by MacMan on Sat 8th Oct 2011 13:11 UTC
Member since:

The vast majority of Windows apps are written with .Net, which is basically the same type of system as Java (memory managed byte code runs in a jit'ed env).

So, why is .Net great for desktop apps, but Java is considered bad?

Personally, the app I use 90% of the time is Eclipse (for C++/Python/Fortran) and I think its fantastic.

Reply Score: 0

Nelson Member since:

Because Java is a good two or three release cycles behind .NET

Reply Parent Score: 0

ggeldenhuys Member since:

And you comment is supposed to tell us what exactly?

Reply Parent Score: 2

BluenoseJake Member since:

Because Visual Studio is so far and above any Java IDE that Java can't compete, not to mention that .net inherited all the millions of VB developers.

Reply Parent Score: 1

ggeldenhuys Member since:

Because Visual Studio is so far and above any Java IDE that Java can't compete,

Have you every tried IntelliJ IDEA? That's the only IDE that got me really excited about programming again.

Reply Parent Score: 3

Moochman Member since:

I've used both extensively, and can honestly say that this kind of hyperbole is just a lot of hot air. While it's true that the GUI design tools are better than what's available for Java, when it comes to pure code editing and navigation I find the Java-based IDEs to be nicer. Eclipse and NetBeans at the least equal VS in this regard, while IntelliJ pretty much beats it.

Reply Parent Score: 2