To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
There is no reason to believe they wouldn't have developed or bought another operating system (either NeXT or Apple). Windows (NT) was mostly written from scratch.
There are other possible parellel universes were other systems became dominant. But they didn't, and that speaks for Thompson and Ritchie's work, and they should be honored for that.
"no Next no OSX" isn't true. Just have a look at the Copland project. It could also be a BeOS follower.
But without Unix no Linux. That's bad.
Nevertheless RIP Dennis Ritchie!
BeOS is quite indebted to Unix (and C++ to C), and Copland never even reached Alpha status. Of course, this kind of alternate history is a bit rubbish anyway, since Jobs might have based Next on some alternate-history descendent of the system that gained popularity in the absence of Unix. It's not like there wouldn't be something else out there.
My idea was to point out how much Apple's current success builds on the work of Ritchie, but I phrased it wrong.




Member since:
2005-11-14
I think it would be fair to say that without Unix, no Next and no Next no OS X, and without OS X, the iPod (Classic, not Touch) would now be Apple's main product.