Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 13th Oct 2011 21:33 UTC, submitted by mahmudinashar
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu Ah, it's that time of the year again. We already had this up on the sidebar, but I figured we'd turn it into a proper front page item - mostly because I want to discuss the move by the Ubuntu team to no longer install GNOME 2 as the 'classic' desktop option - which pretty much ends any and all involvement for me with Ubuntu (KDE 4 here I come). There's more to this than just that, of course, so those of you who do like Unity still have enough reason to upgrade.
Thread beginning with comment 492971
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment Title
by Bringbackanonposting on Thu 13th Oct 2011 23:37 UTC
Bringbackanonposting
Member since:
2005-11-16

I've run Kubuntu for a few years now, since the emergence of KDE4. There has been some troubling moments on the way for sure.
11.04 has been the best so far. I actually use it for work on my Core i7 ASUS. When I read "sluggish" from posters here I do break out a smirk. Not a word I would use for any OS on modern day hardware IMO.
If you want to run 11.04/11.10 on a 5 year old PC, then sure you will notice a difference between GNOME/KDE/XFCE/etc.

Reply Score: 2

RE: Comment Title
by lemur2 on Thu 13th Oct 2011 23:54 in reply to "Comment Title"
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

I've run Kubuntu for a few years now, since the emergence of KDE4. There has been some troubling moments on the way for sure. 11.04 has been the best so far. I actually use it for work on my Core i7 ASUS. When I read "sluggish" from posters here I do break out a smirk. Not a word I would use for any OS on modern day hardware IMO. If you want to run 11.04/11.10 on a 5 year old PC, then sure you will notice a difference between GNOME/KDE/XFCE/etc.


I am running Kubuntu 11.10 on my netbook with only a 1Ghz AMD C-50 APU. It isn't old, but it certainly isn't powerful either.

Using the open source AMD/ATI graphics drivers and the kubuntu-low-fat-settings package makes Kubuntu 11.10 run perfectly well even on this low-resource machine. It runs better (more responsive, etc) than the Windows 7 OS that came with the machine.

At home I also have an Athlon_64x2 2Ghz machine with a low-end Radeon HD 4350 graphics card, also running Kubuntu with the open source Radeon graphics drivers. This machine also runs KDE4 very well indeed, and I might point out that the system itself is six years old now, although I did update the graphics card early in 2009.

If anyone doubts the open source graphics drivers, apparently they are good enough for Windows ...

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd_linux_wec7&n...

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[2]: Comment Title
by Slambert666 on Fri 14th Oct 2011 03:55 in reply to "RE: Comment Title"
Slambert666 Member since:
2008-10-30

It runs better (more responsive, etc) than the Windows 7 OS that came with the machine.


When you say things like this everyone knows you are lying through your teeth.

Reply Parent Score: 5