Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Oct 2011 20:59 UTC, submitted by Ola Jensen
Thread beginning with comment 493403
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: No memory protection
by Alfman on Wed 19th Oct 2011 05:26
in reply to "RE[4]: No memory protection"
ncafferkey,
"No, memory protection hurting performance isn't a big worry among AROS devs or users. The real issue is finding a way to introduce it without breaking source compatibility (too much)."
I know very little about this platform, but I'm curious what kind of software requires the absence of memory protection? Is this because amiga apps routinely access hardware directly? Or they routinely read/write bios/os structures?
RE[6]: No memory protection
by viton on Wed 19th Oct 2011 08:02
in reply to "RE[5]: No memory protection"
AmigaOS is a Single Address Space OS, where an App or OS can pick any object of other applications. That makes data passing and sharing easy and fast. As I see it, the only way to do memory protection transparently is protection domains that require tagged memory allocations to specify data access rights.





Member since:
2006-09-15
No, memory protection hurting performance isn't a big worry among AROS devs or users. The real issue is finding a way to introduce it without breaking source compatibility (too much).