Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 22nd Oct 2011 22:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 493786
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: WP7 just doesn't compete
by modmans2ndcoming on Sat 22nd Oct 2011 23:37
in reply to "RE: WP7 just doesn't compete"
how long did it take Apple to get to that point?
Windows Phone 7 Mango is looking to be a great OS... I would have gotten a windows phone but the current generation of hardware sucked (IMHO... All I wanted was an AMOLED screen rather than an LCD screen... so... I got an Android.... Perhaps I will get a winpho7 phone next time.
RE[3]: WP7 just doesn't compete
by ashes_786 on Sun 23rd Oct 2011 00:07
in reply to "RE[2]: WP7 just doesn't compete"
No doubt it looks great but its just skin deep, multitasking is a joke, the web browser is a joke and the marketplace makes the Android Market look professional. I hope it gets better as I've just bought a WP7 phone for my dad (iPhone was too costly and Android isn't for the faint hearted) I just hope it gets better.
RE[2]: WP7 just doesn't compete
by ashes_786 on Sun 23rd Oct 2011 00:04
in reply to "RE: WP7 just doesn't compete"





Member since:
2005-11-13
I haven't used WP7 myself, but have wondered about it. I read recently were Balmer and one of the other execs were talking about how Android was for geeks (or 'computer scientists') and WP7 was for 'the rest of us'. Well, iOS already serves to be the phone for tech tards, so what exactly is WP7 supposed to be good for?
On one hand, it may be that WP7 is sort of the middle ground between Android and iOS, but while iOS has gone PC free, WP7 is still dependent on the Zune software? Haven't we moved past needing a bloated media manager app for syncing updates and such?